Last week,
in an interview with The Zimbabwean, Zanu (PF) national spokesperson Rugare
Gumbo made no bones about his party’s rejection of continued Southern African
Development Community facilitation of the political logjam that has stalled our
nation’s development and progress. He equated further involvement by the
regional block in our political affairs to an affront on this country’s
sovereignty, saying there was no need for further reforms, hence SADC must ship
out. His reasoning, which of course is reflective of the Zanu (PF) position,
was that we are soon to adopt a new constitution that will provide a roadmap
towards elections and, hence, a new political-social-economic dispensation.
But this
reasoning is fatally fallacious, and smacks of mischief on the part of Zanu (PF).
To start with, it is wrong to appeal to the coming constitution as
justification for the exclusion of SADC. It must be remembered that even when
the SADC facilitation team came on board, Zimbabwe had a constitution. Even
though it was flawed, adherence to the constitution would have averted the
crisis that we are currently grappling with. For instance, the Lancaster House
Constitution made provisions for the respect of human rights, media freedom and
the impartiality of service chiefs, yet these were flouted with impunity. It
therefore does not follow that a new constitution will automatically spawn a
culture of constitutionalism.
Second, the
involvement of the SADC facilitation team does not translate to a corrosion of
our sovereignty at all. SADC is not coming with guns and battalions to change
things in Zimbabwe, but is trying to help us resolve issues through amicable
negotiation in which the principal political parties have centre stage. After
all, Zanu (PF) was not forced into the negotiation process at gun-point. They
willingly signed the Global Political Agreement in 2008. There are several
issues agreed in that document that need resolving, among them security sector
re-alignment, and media and electoral reform. Zanu (PF) was a willing signatory
to the GPA and is therefore bound to ensure that it is consummated. Third,
Zimbabwe is a member of SADC, and is therefore bound by the various treaties to
which it is a signatory. Whether Zanu (PF) likes it or not, this country
adopted the SADC guidelines on free and fair elections and must adhere to them.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar