The Zimbabwe military was one of the
best in Africa with good training, vast operational experience and progressive
doctrines and policies drawn from all over the world. After three armies which
fought against each during the liberation struggle, the Rhodesians and Zanla
and Zipra, were integrated in 1980 to become a relatively modern and
professional force, it was deployed in Mozambique from 1983-1992 and later
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from 1998 to 2002. The Zimbabwe National Army, which
together Air Force of Zimbabwe form the ZDF, also participated in observer and
peacekeeping missions in Angola, Rwanda, Somalia, Lesotho, Ivory Coast,
Liberia, Nepal, Burundi and Sudan. Furthermore, it also took part in natural
disasters rescue missions in Namibia, Zambia and Mozambique. That is partly why
the South African government has requested Air Force of Zimbabwe instructors
help in training and modernizing the South African Air Force, a positive
testimonial for the ZDF.
Despite its good organization and its
vision to “provide a highly professional land force capable of carrying out its
constitutional mandate”, the ZDF has in recent years seen its integrity and
credibility diminishing due to its growing politicalisation and brazen dabbling
in partisan politics by its commanders at the behest of Zanu PF. Although this
has been happening since the 1980s, the military started being consistently
deployed into political terrain when President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu PF
were facing serious problems beginning 2000 following the emergence of the MDC.
During every election since then, the military is deployed covertly and
sometimes openly to do political commissariat duties for Zanu PF which has now
formally employed former Air vice-Marshal Henry Muchena and ex-CIO
director-internal Sydney Nyanhungo.
While in some instances, military units
are deployed in uniform to posture politically and campaign for Zanu PF, there
are also clandestine deployments, mainly of soldiers who have now come to be
known as “Boys On Leave” as they are given time to be off their professional
duties to do political work for Zanu PF. As Mugabe and Zanu PF came under
increasing political pressure, security service chiefs – who are now some of
the richest people in Zimbabwe with farms, huge houses and fleets of luxury
cars – have openly declared their political loyalty to Mugabe and Zanu PF,
ensuring the military is manipulated and abused for campaign purposes. Since Zanu PF is engulfed in internal
strife and its structures have collapsed in many areas, state institutions,
particularly the military, are now propping it up and that is why security
forces are currently its pillar of strength. During the Global Political
Agreement (GPA) negotiations, the issue of security sector reform loomed large.
Calls for reformation of the military, police, prisons, state intelligence
services and other critical arms of the security sector are growing. Despite
clear provisions in Article XIII of the GPA which stipulate that “state organs
and institutions do not belong to any party and should be impartial in the
discharge of their duties”, senior top ranking military and police officers
have been quoted on several occasions openly supporting Zanu PF while clothed
in uniform and on official duty.
Defence minister Emmerson Mnangagwa
recently claimed security sector reforms are not part of the GPA and parties
pushing for this are driven by an “illegal regime change agenda”. Zimbabwe Democracy Institute director
Pedzisai Ruhanya said the security sector has always been the driving force
behind Mugabe’s rule, hence Zanu PF’s stiff resistance to reforms in that area.
“The state security apparatus has been deeply involved in the politics of the
country and has been the vanguard in defense of Mugabe’s rule for 33 years
now,” he said.
Ruhanya also said security forces have
openly played Zanu PF’s commissariat role in all previous elections, citing the
June 2008 presidential poll run-off after Mugabe had suffered a historic defeat
to Prime Minister Tsvangirai in the first round of voting. The security
sector’s open support for Zanu PF has raised legitimate fears that imminent
crucial elections could lead to a repeat of the bloody June 2008 poll —
condemned internationally as a sham — in which 200 opposition supporters lost
their lives. Eldred Masunungure, a professor of political science at the
University of Zimbabwe, said despite professional integration and retraining of
the military since 1980 the state has failed to cut the symbiotic relationship
between former guerrilla commanders and Zanu PF political leaders.
“In 1980 the British Military and
Advisory Training Team (Bmatt) failed to inculcate professionalism in the
Zimbabwe Defence Forces through a separation of military activities from
political ones as there was no clear division between military and political
engagements during the armed struggle,” Masunungure said. “That relationship
makes it unavoidable for the military to react in defence of Mugabe and Zanu
PF. So when Zanu PF began to weaken politically around 2000, political threats
from a vibrant opposition MDC automatically forced the military to jump to the
rescue of their former liberation movement,” he said. Analysts say the partisan role of the
military in politics is a threat to reform and transition to democracy.
However, another political analyst Alexander Rusero said the problem is not the
security forces but political manipulation. “Mugabe is employing Machiavellian
politics in which he does not want to rein in the security sector because this
will lead to his downfall,” Rusero said. “He has created a patronage network
and a situation of an interdependent relationship between politicians and
military commanders.” Analysts say the reason reforms are needed in the
security sector is that, military commanders are not only violating the
constitution and laws, but their own vision and core values which include
professionalism and integrity”.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar