THE Zanu PF element of
the inclusive government has unilaterally withdrawn Zimbabwe’s application for
electoral funding from the United Nations (UN) as part of a well-calculated
move to avoid scrutiny in the run-up to, during and after the next crucial general
elections, it has emerged.
Fearing the UN
mission, which is demanding meetings with political parties and civil society organizations
before releasing money to fund elections, would shift the spotlight to dark
corners of the country, President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu PF ministers last
week blocked the team from Turtle Bay, the UN’s headquarters in a New York neighborhood
on Manhattan. Sources said Mugabe and his Zanu PF officials feared the UN team
led by Tadjoudine Ali-Diabacte, a former member of the Togolese Election
Commission who has served as an election observer for the National Democratic
Institute –– would use the opportunity to visit Zimbabwe to gather information
about the political and security situation in the country instead of only focusing
on electoral issues.
The UN team wanted to
meet political parties and civic groups. It also intended to visit the three
Mashonaland provinces, Manicaland, Masvingo and Midlands, including areas where
violence erupted during the disputed 2008 presidential election run-off. Zanu
PF was scared of this and then blocked the mission, sources said. “The reason
why Mugabe and his closest courtiers don’t want the UN team is that they want
to avoid close scrutiny before, during and after elections,” a senior
government official said. “If they allow the UN team in they fear it would
gather detailed information on the political and security situation, and then
use it to refocus international attention and debate on Zimbabwe ahead of elections.”
As hinted at by
Justice minister Patrick Chinamasa this week, Mugabe and his loyalists are
afraid of the sort of exposure and condemnation they suffered after the visit
to the country in 2005 by UN envoy Anna Tibaijuka following Murambatsvina
devastations. Tibaijuka’s damning report said the shacks demolition campaign
which targeted victims with mass forced evictions affected 900 000 men, women
and children even though to date the recommendations made by the UN Secretary
General’s special envoy on human settlement issues are still not yet fully
implemented. Zimbabwe, which has been slapped with sanctions by Western
countries over policy differences and human rights violations, also survived
being put on the UN Security Council agenda in 2008 after a blood-soaked
presidential election run-off in June that.
Around the same time
the country also survived UN scrutiny over a cholera outbreak which killed 4
0000 and affected 100 000 after former United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) chief in Harare, Agostinho Zacarias, who had close links with Zanu PF,
failed to take preventive measures. Sources said these experiences influenced
Mugabe and his ministers to block the UN team even if the UNDP partly funded
the constitution-making exercise and has always mobilised humanitarian support
for Zimbabwe. “The Zanu PF section of government has a cocktail of measures to
prevent outside scrutiny. They don’t want the UN, they also don’t want Western
election observers, they are determined to limit the presence of Western
journalists and restrict the involvement of Sadc during Zimbabwe’s elections,”
another official said.
“That is why the UN,
Sadc troika representatives, (South African President Jacob) Zuma’s
facilitation team, foreign journalists and Western observers are being
restricted. It is an irony because this is happening at a time when the West is
now willing to engage Mugabe and accept his victory if he wins freely and
fairly.”
Recently a group of
Western countries, Friends of Zimbabwe, including the European Union (EU),
United States and Asia-Pacific states, among others, met with Zanu PF, MDC-T
and MDC representatives, as well as Sadc envoys, in London to assess the
situation in the country and map the way forward. The EU even lifted sanctions
on ministers and Zanu PF-associated entities, except on Mugabe, his family and
security services chiefs and state mining companies.
The US this week sent
an envoy Andrew Young to Harare in a bid to mend diplomatic relations. This
followed the blocking of the UN team. Government had on February 4 made an
official request to the UN for US$250 million the constitutional referendum and
general elections through a letter jointly written by Finance minister Tendai
Biti and Chinamasa to UNDP country representative Alain Noudehou. In response on February 11, the UN said a
Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) would have to visit the country before funding
could be released. Chinamasa and Biti wrote another letter on April 4,
indicating Zimbabwe’s readiness to welcome the NAM. However, when Zanu PF
realised the UN team wanted to meet a variety of players, among them, political
parties and civic groups such as the Zimbabwe Election Support Network,
ZimRights, National Association of Non-Governmental Organistaions, and Women of
Zimbabwe Arise – groups at forefront of resisting repression and human rights
abuses – it changed its mind and started making excuses.
“It was clear the UN
team would glean too much information and also effectively monitor the
elections by virtue of their funding. Zanu PF wants as little scrutiny as
possible, hence the U-turn on funding,” a source said. Noudehou confirmed
different expectations that led to the deadlock. “In the course of deploying
the mission to Zimbabwe, it became clear that there were different expectations
on the modalities of the NAM,” he said. “Further efforts were made by the UN to
engage with the government and explain the purpose and scope of the NAM. As of
now, no agreement has been reached on the modalities.” Last month Zanu PF
collapsed Jomic meetings after insisting Zuma’s facilitation team and Sadc
troika representatives should not be involved in full Jomic meetings. Sources
said this was also because Zanu PF feared scrutiny. To limit further scrutiny,
Zanu PF is also resisting an extraordinary Sac summit before election and
making it difficult for Zec to accredit foreign observers by and journalists to
monitor and cover the election respectively.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar